JusticeForScottDyleski.Com

Seeking Justice for Scott Dyleski and Pamela Vitale

Home

New Evidence

Confession and Evidence

New Petition

BLOG

Case Summary

What Happened to Pamela?

Who is Scott Dyleski?

The Witness

Lead Detective Lies

Scott's Rock Solid Alibi

The Long Shower

The Dog Trail

The Glove

The Blond Hairs on Pam

The Big Screen TV

Fred Curiel

Alibi and Time of Death

Prosecutor Hal Jewett

Fraud and Murder?

A Planted List???

Defense?

Judge Zuniga

Curiel vs CCC

Reports From Court

Preliminary Hearing

Opening Statements

Bombshells on Day Four

Testimony Continues

Curiel Alibi "Confusion"

Immunity and Inept Cops

David Curiel- A Liar?

Loose Ends

Defense Calls Witnesses

Closing Arguments

Verdict

Sentencing Day

Media Archive

Prelim Transcripts

Scott's Address

Contact Us

Dan's version of the crime scene



Almost immediately after Pamela's death, Daniel Horowitz began to offer information to the public about the crime scene and observations he made concerning his wife. One of the first pieces of information he offered was that he found Pamela  wearing only a tee-shirt and her underwear. He asserted he found her in her "sleep clothes". source

This was blatant misinformation, that had drastic consequences.

The fact is, Pamela was NOT found in her sleep clothes. She was wearing a tee-shirt, underwear, a long black skirt, and socks.

When Fred Curiel began to question Scott Dyleski about his activities the morning of Pamela's death, Scott claimed he saw a woman that day in a car on Hunsacker Canyon road. The woman he described matched the description of Pamela Vitale.

Immediately, Fred and Kim Curiel assumed he was lying.


From the prelim testimony of Fred Curiel:

And I said, "Because if there was a struggle, as Dan described, then it was virtually guaranteed that there will be DNA under her fingernails. There will probably be footprints and there may be hair." And she (Kim) asked him whether there was anyone who saw you or could corroborate that you were on a walk, any cars go by.  And at that point he -- he -- he said, "Yes." He said there was a red car that went by and a white car. And he said something- he said he was walking, um, and, um, the white car -- there was a woman driving a white car, and she had said something strange to him.  And he -- initially he couldn't remember what it was.  He wasn't clear what she had said. And he said it was something like, "You got to believe."  He said she reached over, grabbed his arm and said, "You got to believe," or something strange like that. And I asked him -- I asked him what's -- we asked him what direction they were driving.  This was up towards the Vitale house, towards -- this is into Hunsaker Canyon Road.  And he -- he had described the woman as having brown hair and round glasses, and -- which is -- which fit a description of Pam.

And my wife kind of looked at me, you know,
recognizing the description, and -- and I -- without her saying anything I said, "No.  There's no way that --" I said, "Pam was found in her underwear and a T-shirt.  There's no way she was out driving that morning".


The truth is, it is entirely possible that Pamela was in a car that day. Why was this alleged sighting ignored by police? Why wasn't Scott considered a possible witness?







Page currently under construction







Back

Copyright 2006-2011, JusticeForScottDyleski.Com